What interviewers are actually assessing
Immigration officer interviews assess sound judgement under ambiguity, consistent and fair decision-making, and genuine integrity, since the role carries real authority over people's lives with limited room for error. Interviewers commonly use structured, scenario-based questions to assess how you would apply policy and discretion together, rather than only recalling regulation from memory.
Common questions and how to answer them
"How would you handle a situation where a person's documentation seems genuine but something feels inconsistent?" Show structured, calm judgement: follow proper verification procedure, remain professional and fair, and avoid jumping to a conclusion on instinct alone. "Tell me about a time you had to apply a rule fairly, even when the outcome felt harsh." Use a genuine example, from any relevant context, showing you can separate personal feeling from consistent, fair rule application. "How do you stay composed when dealing with a distressed or hostile member of the public?" A specific, real example demonstrating calm, professional composure under genuine pressure is well received.
How to prepare
Review the relevant public sector values and behaviours framework for the specific agency, since immigration and border roles commonly assess against a published competency framework similar to other government and civil service recruitment. Prepare genuine examples of fair, consistent judgement and composure under pressure from any part of your background.
Frequently asked questions
Before your next interview, it helps to have the fundamentals down. Our complete guide to preparing for a job interview covers the basics, and the STAR method is a reliable way to structure almost any answer under pressure.