What the Watson Glaser test measures
The Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal is a widely used assessment, particularly in law, consulting, and graduate finance recruitment, that measures how rigorously you reason from evidence rather than assumption. It is built around five distinct sections: recognising unstated assumptions, evaluating the strength of arguments, drawing valid inferences, interpreting information accurately, and assessing deductive reasoning, each testing a subtly different critical thinking skill.
The five test sections and format
Each section presents a short passage or set of statements followed by questions requiring you to judge inferences as true, probably true, insufficient data, probably false, or false; identify unstated assumptions within an argument; judge whether an argument is strong or weak based on relevance and importance, not just whether you personally agree with it; and determine whether a conclusion follows logically and necessarily from given premises. The test is strictly timed, and most candidates find the time pressure, not the underlying logic, is the main challenge.
Common mistakes that lower your score
The most common mistake is answering based on real-world plausibility or personal opinion rather than strictly what the given information supports; the Watson Glaser test specifically penalises this, since legal and consulting reasoning must stay within the facts presented, not outside assumptions. Confusing "probably true" with "true," or treating a strong argument as one you personally agree with rather than one that is logically relevant and important, are also frequent, avoidable errors.
How to prepare
Practise with genuine Watson Glaser-style timed question sets rather than generic critical thinking material, since the specific five-category format and its distinct scoring logic take deliberate practice to internalise. Read every passage and premise carefully before evaluating any statement, and discipline yourself to stay strictly within the information given, resisting the natural urge to bring in outside knowledge or assumptions.