What verbal reasoning tests actually ask you to do
A verbal reasoning test gives you a short passage of text, often about a business or industry topic, followed by a series of statements. For each statement, you decide whether it is true, false, or whether it is impossible to say based only on the information given, without using outside knowledge or assumptions. This last option, cannot say, is the part that catches most candidates out, because the instinct is to reason using general knowledge rather than restricting yourself strictly to the passage.
Employers use verbal reasoning tests to assess how carefully you read and interpret written information under pressure, which maps directly onto tasks like reviewing reports, contracts, or client communications accurately and quickly. It is one of the most commonly used tests across law, consulting, banking, and the civil service.
A worked example passage and question
Passage: "The company's revenue grew last year, driven mainly by its overseas division, though the exact percentage increase was not disclosed in the report. Domestic sales remained broadly flat compared to the previous year."
Statement 1: "Revenue increased by more than 10 percent." Answer: cannot say. The passage confirms revenue grew but never gives a figure, so any specific percentage cannot be confirmed or denied, no matter how plausible it sounds.
Statement 2: "The overseas division contributed to the company's revenue growth." Answer: true. The passage states this directly: growth was "driven mainly by its overseas division."
Statement 3: "Domestic sales grew faster than overseas sales." Answer: false. The passage states domestic sales were flat while overseas drove growth, which directly contradicts this statement.
Notice the pattern: statement 1 fails because it adds a specific number the passage never gives; statement 2 succeeds because it restates something the passage says directly; statement 3 fails because it contradicts the passage outright. That three-way distinction, confirmed, contradicted, or simply not stated, is the entire skill the test is measuring.
The traps that catch most candidates
The most common trap is treating a statement as true because it seems reasonable or matches general knowledge about the topic, when the passage itself does not actually confirm it. If a passage says a company's revenue increased last year but does not say by how much, a statement claiming "revenue increased by more than 10%" should be marked cannot say, not true, even if that figure sounds plausible. The test is deliberately checking whether you can separate what the text states from what you are inferring or assuming.
A second common trap is absolute language: statements using words like "always," "never," or "all" are frequently false even when a softer version of the same statement would be true, because the passage rarely supports an absolute claim. Reading the exact wording of each statement, rather than skimming for the general idea, is the single biggest factor in scoring well.
How to prepare effectively
Practise with timed verbal reasoning question sets so the true, false, cannot say format becomes automatic rather than something you have to think through from scratch on the day. When practising, deliberately note every question you got wrong and identify whether the error was misreading the passage or incorrectly assuming information not stated. Read the passage once fully before attempting any statement, since jumping straight to the statements without full context is a common cause of avoidable errors under time pressure.
Frequently asked questions
Before your next interview, it helps to have the fundamentals down. Our complete guide to preparing for a job interview covers the basics, and the STAR method is a reliable way to structure almost any answer under pressure.